Senior leadership team reviewing operational risk and proportionate OT cybersecurity investment priorities

Stakeholder

Senior Leadership

For leaders deciding which OT risks need immediate action, planned investment or explicit residual-risk acceptance.

proportionate improvementoperational resiliencedefensible decisionsprioritised action plan

Decisions and constraints for this role

Questions likely to need resolution

  • operational risk
  • project delays
  • regulatory exposure
  • reputation
  • investment justification
  • prioritisation of improvement work

Review focus

Meridian sets out the risks, available evidence and improvement options so leaders can decide what needs action and when.

Legacy Control SystemsProject Cybersecurity AssuranceFlat OT NetworksPoor Asset Visibility

Work and outputs

Engineering work

  • Turn OT cybersecurity uncertainty into clear risk themes, practical priorities, and evidence-based decisions.
  • Separate immediate exposure concerns from longer-term improvement work and project assurance needs.
  • Explain trade-offs around resilience, regulatory exposure, investment timing, and brownfield implementation constraints.
  • Provide leadership-ready summaries without overstating what any single control or project can achieve.

Records produced

  • Executive OT risk summary
  • Prioritised improvement plan
  • Investment roadmap for proportionate risk reduction
  • Residual risk statement
  • Assurance summary for governance discussion

Related services

OT Cybersecurity Engineering Support

Choose this when your project needs specialist engineering capacity. A defined OT cybersecurity work package for risk, architecture, design review, supplier interfaces and assurance evidence within an active industrial project.

Discuss OT risk priorities

Use the discovery call to discuss the responsibility, project stage, evidence gap or operating constraint without sharing sensitive site details.